window.close
  1. Home>
  2. About OMRON>
  3. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)>
  4. CSR-based Management>
  5. Dialogue>
  6. The Global Leadership Network

The Global Leadership Network

  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large

What is CSR for a global company?

Mr. Steven A. Rochlin
Mr. Steven A. Rochlin

Steven A. Rochlin is the Head of AccountAbility North America and Executive Director of the Global Leadership Network. A noted authority in the area of corporate citizenship, he has published numerous articles, and is frequently invited to speak on the role of business in society. Mr. Rochlin serves as the principal investigator for numerous initiatives defining world-class global corporate citizenship.

  • Masahiro Ijiri

    Masahiro Ijiri Senior General
    ManagerManagement
    Administration DivisionIndustrial
    Automation Company

  • Ichiro Kamei

    Ichiro Kamei General ManagerBusiness
    Administration Department
    Strategy Planning
    DivisionElectronic Components Company

  • Keiichi Miyazaki

    Keiichi Miyazaki General ManagerPersonnel &
    General Affairs
    DepartmentManagement Administration
    DivisionAutomotive Electronic Components Company

  • Hideyuki Ohtani

    Hideyuki Ohtani General Manager Legal &
    Compliance DepartmentStrategy & Planning Division Social
    Systems Solutions Business Company

  • Katsunori Ochi

    Katsunori Ochi Supervisor Personnel and General Affairs
    DepartmentManagement Strategy DivisionOMRON Healthcare Co., Ltd.

On March 15, 2007, personnel in charge of CSR management from OMRON's business companies (BCs) and Steven A. Rochlin from the Global Leadership Network (GLN*) exchanged views regarding CSR challenges that the OMRON Group faces.

Through this discussion, OMRON staff received valuable input from Mr. Rochlin regarding the promotion of global compliance, supply chain management, and other issues.

* GLN (The Global Leadership Network)
The GLN is a landmark team consisting of globally top-performing companies, along with the Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College in the U.S. and AccountAbility in the U.K. The GLN has created an internal planning and assessment framework that helps companies align their CSR commitment and performance with their core business strategies to ensure performance excellence in corporate citizenship.

How can we balance 'benefits for society' and 'profitability'?

Rochlin:

I remain very impressed by the incredible innovation that OMRON delivers, and the commitment you have to corporate responsibility. One of the things that I have heard from people at OMRON is how your products are vital to society as well as to the environment. And it seems that each of you has a story on how you identified a major problem that has had no solutions in terms of developing systems to address it.

Let me start by asking an operations-related question. When you develop a new product or system that has an important social impact, do you devote the same amount of time toward delivering a profit on such a system, or are you more patient? Or is it different for each case?

Ochi:

For OMRON Healthcare, it's case by case. For example, we have a product that is an ECG (electrocardiograph) monitor. The product has not yet become a profitable line of business, but we have received many words of appreciation from users and endorsement from many doctors. In the meantime we will remain patient in terms of profitability and try to cultivate the product from a long-term perspective. That is how we position this particular product.

Ijiri:

In the case of the Industrial Automation Company (IAB), we believe that we must always secure a certain level of profits as long as we do business. Does that mean that we will withdraw from a business if it doesn't immediately deliver a profit? No. If the product is aligned with our strategy and domain of focus, and as long as it benefits society, we position the product as an 'investment'. And we will try to absorb the cost of the investment by means of existing business. This allows us to nurture new ideas while securing a profit for IAB as a whole.

Rochlin:

So long-term thinking is definitely part of your plan.

How can we assure that overseas Group companies are strictly in compliance?

Rochlin:

I have heard about these challenges from others at OMRON: how to promote CSR activities, how to make sure that employees are in compliance in China, how to deal with supply chain issues, and the issue, of course, of diversity. We could talk about some other types of issues. For example, how climate change will continue to affect your customers, and how that will affect your future products and business models. We might talk about, for example, growing healthcare costs around the world and the difficulty of providing people access to preventive care. Of course, many of you mentioned safety and security. And there seems to be a growing gap between the types of regions that have access to systems that promote safety and security and those that don't. So which one of these many challenges do your companies put priority on?

Kamei:

For the Electronic Components Company (ECB), our top priority has been in instilling OMRON's corporate principles among employees. We believe that to address CSR, it is most important that our staff fully understand that OMRON is a company that has these corporate principles. Even so, in some countries compliance remains a tough challenge. In fact, there was one case in which a local employee was fired for fraud. It has nothing to do with nationality--it's also possible that a Japanese expatriate may become involved with fraud. And some other countries face management-related challenges.

Ijiri:

In China and Asia-Pacific, IAB took the lead in providing compliance and ethical conduct education for local staff, and we have also performed monitoring for compliance status. We strengthened education for those staff dispatched from Japan to work at local companies, so we haven't had any scandals involving Japanese expatriates. However, there still remain local customs that condone bribery or other unfair dealings in some regions. In such regions, the biggest challenge is how we can make local staff align with our way of thinking that emphasizes fairness and integrity.

How can we deal with CSR management in the supply chain?

Miyazaki:

The Automotive Electronic Components Company (AEC) itself assumes a position as supplier for our client companies. From our customers' point of view, AEC is an element of their own supply chain. The automobile industry is very strict about delivery schedules, and demands very high standards of technology. Our employees, of course, understand the OMRON Principles and CSR very well. But as long as we try to continue meeting the demands of our clients, we will get extremely busy and tend to work long hours. In that situation, some employees feel that concepts like 'maximum customer satisfaction' and 'respect for individuality and diversity (of employees)' specified in the OMRON Principles contradict each other. Some may wonder if there's a gap between what is actually happening in our workplace and how CSR practices should work as an ideal. In other words, there's a gap between the principles and how they can be put into practice. We believe that we must continually challenge ourselves to overcome this gap.

Rochlin:

I think OMRON maintains a consistent stance for eliminating the gap between principles and reality. But I can certainly see examples of tension in the supply chain, and so there is no good solution to the problem that you've raised. Because to solve this, it requires that someone bear more costs. Or it requires breakthroughs and innovation in your business process. Either one involves money and time. So from your perspective, one question is: if you are going to be asked to comply with supply chain practices, do you need more consistent rules that everyone follows?

Ohtani:

As far as the Social Systems Solutions Business Company (SSB) is concerned, information security has recently become a major societal challenge. So we have started to deal with information management that includes information leakage problems in the supply chain. Our approach is like this: first, we make a checklist and 'visualize' rules that we want both our staff and suppliers to observe. Then, we evaluate how much these rules are followed using the checklist. We also consider that worksite monitoring, auditing and inspection are necessary, both inside and outside our company. Education for our staff and also for suppliers is also necessary. We are aiming to promote rule-formation, monitoring and education as a 'triple set' package.

Ijiri:

We ourselves should also improve our evaluation skills. No matter how well defined the rules are, it's no use if our abilities to assess the compliance of rules are poor. Obviously it takes time to raise evaluation skills. But to avoid the risk of incorrect evaluation, it is important to improve our evaluation skills.

Ochi:

As for supply chain management, in some cases at OMRON Healthcare we form a capital alliance with a supplier and send a director-class representative to the company in order to assure good product quality. The first aim is to enhance quality, but by sharing the OMRON Principles and code of conduct with our suppliers we are striving to go further into CSR management for the supply chain.

How should global CSR activities be promoted?

Ijiri:

It is vital that we tackle important CSR challenges at the global level. But for things like 'respect for diversity', it would be difficult for all of our Group companies worldwide to implement the same measures. In Japan, our focus is on employment of persons with disabilities and creating work environments in which women can work more comfortably and demonstrate their capabilities fully. But it's impossible to import these initiatives directly to other regions. The concept of directly applying our experience in Japan to other countries is not always applicable. So Mr. Rochlin, could you give us some advice regarding global promotion of CSR activities?

Rochlin:

Well, first I think it's important to start with common sense. I think it is important for businesses to identify the things that are most important in the regions, in the areas, and in the markets that are most critical, and deal with them one by one.

As well as the development of new products, it also takes time to develop effective and strategic CSR systems. I think that one challenge for a company is to increase and innovate the ways that they develop systems, production processes and products that respond to these expectations. And I think OMRON has the components, the experience and the growing potential to develop and succeed in this manner, if you choose to continue to invest in it. But it will require great courage and at times great faith.

Lastly, let me say thank you so much for spending the time and sharing it with me.

How should global CSR activities be promoted?

Statement from Steven A. Rochlin--Head of AccountAbility North America, and Executive Director of the Global Leadership Network--for OMRON's CSR Report

GLOBAL LEADERSHIP NETWORKAccount Ability

Since 2004 I have conducted with my colleagues site visits to OMRON's Headquarters in Kyoto. I have met with and interviewed in depth executives and managers from OMRON's executive-suite, its five business companies, and its principal staff functions. In addition, OMRON staff have completed the GLN CSR performance excellence self assessment and planning tool.

The GLN team has provided OMRON with an analysis of its CSR Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) and recommendations for action. OMRON has in my opinion been highly responsive to our analysis and recommendations.

In March 2007 OMRON hosted a meeting of GLN members. Subsequent to the meeting I met with executives from the five business companies and from CSR and other staff functions to determine and update on its progress. OMRON requested I provide this summary analysis of my findings for its report. Note that in no one does this represent a formal, validated audit of OMRON's progress. Rather this represents my informed opinion based on my work as an advisor whose affiliated institutions of GLN, AccountAbility, and Boston College have received financial support from OMRON.

Business Strategy

In my opinion, OMRON has made strong progress at Headquarters in integrating CSR goals with its strategy ? Grand Design 2010. At the operational level, each Business Company is encouraged to develop innovative technology and product solutions that address social and environmental needs and represent business opportunity. OMRON's businesses have created exciting solutions that hold the potential to enhance personal security, safety and health. Other solutions hold the potential to significantly reduce energy use and greenhouse emissions. These examples are featured throughout OMRON's CSR report.

I have suggested to OMRON to continue to prioritize efforts to integrate social and environmental considerations into formal business planning processes. OMRON's sensing and control technologies have create potential application in a variety of arenas that can improve quality of life, sustainable development, and overall well-being. An important consideration for OMRON will be how to apply solutions that can benefit those at all levels of the economic spectrum.

Engaged Learning

OMRON has made great strides to expand its efforts to engage with stakeholders. Historically the company has been highly active in Japan, and leads and participates in many multi-stakeholder forums that address issues of national concern from health care, to community development, to disaster preparedness, to trade and globalization.

Over the last few years, OMRON has expanded its effort to engage with stakeholder groups at a global level, and to address issues from within Japan. For example, OMRON has been actively involved in the Japanese electronics industry association work to design a responsible supply chain code of conduct. CSR and Public Affairs staff have enhanced their role to monitor and identify strategic issues and to help business companies and regional business units to constructively engage with stakeholder representatives.

In my opinion OMRON has room to learn from its experience within Japan, and to take a more strategic approach to stakeholder engagement globally. Many of OMRON's most exciting new product lines involve issues that span the boundaries of commercial opportunity and public goods. For example, OMRON is designing products and systems to improve road safety and reduce traffic accidents. OMRON's health care business is investing extensively in innovative technology to prevent diseases and encourage health and wellness. It's electronic business is creating systems that reduce energy requirements for a variety of ICT systems and home appliances. In addition, several of its business companies are using sensing and control technologies to enhance personal safety, security, and to support law enforcement. Each of these vital arenas involves diverse stakeholder interests. By becoming more actively involved in global discussions, OMRON will learn valuable information that may help improve its innovations. In addition, OMRON will understand stakeholder expectations, and both contribute and respond to these expectations to ensure that broader stakeholders needs are met and concerns are addressed. I have suggested OMRON to become more involved in global stakeholder conversations in relevant policy forums.

Leadership

OMRON has taken in my opinion a unique leadership role. It is working to help champion the CSR movement within Japan. In addition, it has become a prominent ambassador of Japanese companies in a variety of forums from the developing ISO 26000 social responsibility standard, to GRI, to GLN.

I have encouraged OMRON both to expand and deepen its leadership. This includes identifying the most vital, strategically material issues to lend its voice, skills, and competencies to build collaborative solutions. One such example could be in ensuring responsible global supply chain practices, which is becoming a more prominent issue for the electronics industry worldwide. OMRON may argue that other issues are more vital. What is essential is for the company at both a Headquarters level and at the business company level is to go through a rigorous process to identify these material social and environmental issues for which it should take leadership.

Operational Excellence

OMRON has in my opinion made over the past year impressive commitments to improve CSR commitment and performance particularly at corporate headquarters. It has strengthened senior executive leadership and oversight of CSR. It has revitalized its corporate values and is launching a process to make these values core to organizational performance models. It continues to build strong compliance, environmental, and universal design management systems. It has increased its commitment to design responsible supply chain management principles.

Supply chain and treatment of employees in China and elsewhere in Asia are acknowledged by OMRON executives as a continuing challenge. OMRON can play an important leadership role in connecting Japanese industry to global conversations around supply chain and the electronics industry.

Coordination and teamwork between headquarters and the business companies, and from one business company to another appear to be improving, however there is still progress to be made. I have encouraged OMRON to build stronger and more formal linkages between CSR Management HQ and the business companies.

I am pleased for the opportunity to share these opinions in OMRON's CSR report. I look forward to continuing to observe its efforts to progress its CSR performance.

Sincerely,

Steven A. Rochlin
Head of AccountAbility North America

Page Top